Tuesday, February 25, 2014
Production Leveling (Heijunka)
Production leveling, also
known as production smoothing or – by its Japanese original term – heijunka
is a technique for reducing the muda (waste). It was vital to the development
of production efficiency in the Toyota Production System and lean manufacturing. The goal is to produce
intermediate goods at a constant rate so that further processing may also be
carried out at a constant and predictable rate.
On a production line, as in any
process, fluctuations in performance increase waste. This is because equipment,
workers, inventory, and all other elements required for production must always
be prepared for peak production. This is a cost of flexibility. If a later
process varies its withdrawal of parts in terms of timing and quality, the
range of these fluctuations will increase as they move up the line towards the
earlier processes. This is known as demand amplification.
Where demand is constant,
production leveling is easy, but where customer demand fluctuates, two
approaches have been adopted.
1) Demand leveling and
2) Production leveling
through flexible production
To prevent fluctuations in
production, even in outside affiliates, it is important to minimize fluctuation
in the final assembly line. Toyota's final assembly line never assembles the
same automobile model in a batch. Instead, they level production by assembling
a mix of models in each batch and the batches are made as small as possible.
This is in contrast to traditional mass production, where long changeover times
meant that it was more economical to punch out as many parts in each batch as
possible. When the final assembly batches are small, then earlier process
batches, such as the press operations, must also be small and changeover times
must be short. In the Toyota Production System die changes (changeovers) are
made quickly (SMED). In the 1940s changeovers took
two to three hours, in the 1950s they dropped from one hour to 15 minutes, now
they take three minutes
Benefits of
Heijunka
1.
Flexibility As we are getting more MSR (Musical Size
Run), we need to produce all sizes each day in order to reduce inventory at the
end of the line.
2.
Optimization of material inventory levels at all levels
an departments
3.
Balanced use of labor and machines(level workload
across processes)
4.
Smoothed demand on upstream processes and the plant’s
suppliers.
5.
Reduce security risk (seal boxes as soon as possible)
Wednesday, February 19, 2014
QCO (Quick Changeover)
QCO can be termed as rapid &
efficient way of converting a process from running the current product to
running the next product. An organized process continuously reduces the setup
time. QCO stands for Quick change over.
The time from the last good part
till the first good part is produced after the changeover called as QCO time.
QCO can divide in to two
sections.
1. Internal
Setup: Activities that must be performed while the machine is shut down or idle
2. External
Setup: Activities that can be performed while the machine is running or
producing
Most important activity is converting internal activities in to
external activities.
Where does the term QCO came
from?
Land cost in Japan were very high, therefore it was not feasible to store
large inventories of vehicles.
Therefore, they were searching for a solution and because of that QCO
process started by Toyota vehicle manufacturer.
Who invented QCO Process?
Developed by Shigeo Shingo
(In the late 1950’s & early
1960’s chief engineer of Toyota)
Born in 1909 & passed away
on 1990
External consultant for TOYOTA
since 1950’s
Famous with the POKA YOKE &
SMED
How does QCO relate to other
lean tools and concepts?
It really compliments anything
in TPS (Lean Manufacturing). In fact we sort of cringe at the notion of calling
it a tool. Waiting is one of the wastes out of seven wastes and mainly we can
reduce that by using QCO.
Figure 01: Practical Example for QCO
Saturday, February 15, 2014
Lean Manufacturing: Pareto chart and 80%-20% Rule
Lean Manufacturing: Pareto chart and 80%-20% Rule: The Pareto Chart and the 80:20 rule are useful tools to drive Continual or continuous process improvement. If you want your business to flo...
Pareto chart and 80%-20% Rule
The
Pareto Chart and the 80:20 rule are useful tools to drive Continual or
continuous process improvement. If you want your business to flourish and stay
ahead of your competition then you need to stay ahead of them in all aspects of
your business. A pareto chart is one tool that you could use to help you stay
ahead of the competition. The pareto Chart will highlight the vital few areas
for you to target to tackle the bulk of your problems.
The
80:20 rule can help you identify the 20% of the causes that create 80% of the
effect allowing you to focus on those vital 20% for maximum benefit rather than
wasting your resources tackling the other 80% of the causes for minimal
benefit.
The
Pareto chart and the 80:20 rule are powerful tools to help you focus your
resources effectively for maximum benefit and are very simple tools to use.
History
of the Pareto Chart
Vilfredo
Pareto discovered his “pareto principle” whilst studying the distribution of
wealth for his works, he found that 80% of a countries land was owned by just
20% of it’s people. There is some argument as to the origin of his data
however, it is often attributed as being based on Italian data as he was an
Italian, however it is more likely that the data used was in fact from the UK.
This principle was further expanded upon by the quality Guru Joseph Juran who
applied the Pareto Principle across many industrial statistics.
By
using a quality tool such as the pareto chart and the 80:20 Rule you can drive
continuous process improvement.
The 80 20 rule is not always the right ratio, quite often we see
95 5 for instance or 60 40, however the 80 20 rule was the first ratio seen and
identified and the one that seems to fit the majority of scenarios, therefore
it is commonly used as a method to identify the vital few causes to the majority
of our issues.
Directions
for the map Pareto Chart
1. Collect
data about the contributing factors to a particular effect
(for example, the types of damages
discovered in particular style).
2. Order
the categories according to magnitude (Descending order) of effect
(for example, frequency of
damages). If there are many
insignificant categories, they may be grouped together into one category
labeled “other.”
3. Write
the magnitude of contribution (for example, frequency of error) next to each
category and determine the grand total. Calculate the percentage of the total
that each category represents.
4. Working
from the largest category to the smallest, calculate the cumulative percentage
for each category with all of the previous categories.
5. Draw
and label the left vertical axis with the unit of comparison
(for example, “Number of Damage ” from 0 to
the grand total).
6. Draw
and label the horizontal axis with the categories (for example, “Type of
damage”), largest to smallest from left to right.
7. Draw
and label the right vertical axis “Cumulative Percentage,” from 0 to 100
percent, with the 100 percent value at the same height as the grand total mark
on the left vertical axis.
8. Draw
a line graph of the cumulative percentage, beginning with the lower left corner
of the largest category (the “0” point).
9. Analyze
the diagram to indicate the cumulative percentage associated with the “vital
few”
(Using 80:20 Rule )
Identify
the Vital Few
The
whole purpose of our Pareto analysis is to identify what many call the
"Vital Few". With the effect we are looking at (Rejects, stock value,
poor customers, absent employees etc.) being caused by only a small percentage
of the population we are examining we are looking to identifying those vital few
on which we can concentrate our actions.
By
concentrating our actions on the vital few we ensure that we get the greatest
impact from our actions and the greatest return on our investment
Pareto Principle, 80 20 Rule Examples
·
80% of your rejects are caused by 20% of
the causes, so tackling this 20% will eliminate the bulk of your problems.
·
80% of the value of your stock is made
up by 20% of the quantity, so if you need to reduce your stock value to free up
cash you identify the most efficient way to spend your time.
·
80% of your profit comes from 20% of
your line items, so the remaining 80% are not as important if you have to
prioritize your production or decide which to phase out.
·
20% of your suppliers supply 80% of your
goods, so if you need to work on supplier development these are the ones to
work with first.
·
80% of your sales come from 20% of your
clients, so who do you focus on?
·
80% of time off work will come from 20%
of your employees, so you know which to spend time with.
·
80% of your time on this document will
be spent looking at only 20% of it’s content, maybe?
Thursday, February 13, 2014
Yamazumi Charts
Yamazumi ?
A
Yamazumi chart is a stacked bar chart that shows the balance of cycle time
workloads between a number of operators typically in an assembly line or work
cell. The Yamazumi chart can be either for a single product or multi product
assembly line.
Yamazumi
is a Japanese word that literally means to stack up. Toyota uses Yamazumi work
balance charts to visually present the work content of a series of tasks and
facilitate work balancing and the isolation and elimination of non-value added
work content.
Standard
Work Sheets (SWS)
Standardized
work is one of the most powerful but least used lean tools. By documenting the
current best practice, standardized work forms the baseline for kaizen or
continuous improvement. As the standard is improved, the new standard becomes the
baseline for further improvements, and so on. Improving standardized work is a
never-ending process.
Standardized
work consists of three elements:
- Takt
time - which is the rate at which products must be made in a process to
meet customer demand.
- The
precise work sequence in which an operator performs tasks within takt
time.
- The
standard inventory, including units in machines, required to keep the
process operating smoothly.
Wednesday, February 12, 2014
Lean Manufacturing: Basic Introduction about “Andon Systems”
Lean Manufacturing: Basic Introduction about “Andon Systems”: Andon is a manufacturing term referring to a system to notify management, maintenance, and other workers of a quality or process problem...
Basic Introduction about “Andon Systems”
Andon
is a manufacturing term referring to a system to notify
management, maintenance, and other workers of a quality or process problem. The
centerpiece is a signboard incorporating signal lights to indicate which
workstation has the problem. The alert can be activated manually by a worker
using a pullcord or button, or may be activated automatically by the production
equipment itself. The system may include a means to stop production so the
issue can be corrected. Some modern alert systems incorporate audio alarms,
text, or other displays.
An
Andon system is one of the principal elements of the Jidoka quality-control method pioneered by Toyota as part of the Toyota Production
System and
therefore now part of the Lean approach. It gives the worker the ability, and the
empowerment, to stop production when a defect is found, and immediately call
for assistance. Common reasons for manual activation of the Andon are part
shortage, defect created or found, tool malfunction, or the existence of a
safety problem. Work is stopped until a solution has been found. The alerts may
be logged to a database so that they can be studied as part of a
continuous-improvement program.
Sunday, February 9, 2014
A3 thinking
What is an A3 report?
An A3 report is simply an 11 x
17 inch piece of paper outlined into several structured sections. The exact
structure depends upon the type of A3 and the needs of the situation. A general
one consists of the following pattern 1) Background, 2) Current Situation &
Problem, 3) Goal, 4) Root Cause Analysis, 5) Action Items / Implementation
Plan, 6) Check of Results, and 7) Follow Up. The report is used to standardized
and simplify report writing, proposals, status updates, and other common
methods of communication. The content follows the logic of the
Plan-Do-Check-Act cycle.
Where does the term A3
Thinking come from?
Who invented A3 reports?
There is really no single
inventor of A3 reports. Former manager of training at Toyota Isao Kato
describes it more as a combination of forces including the PDCA cycle, the
basic steps for a QC circle, the Toyota concept of making things visible at a
single glance, and the humorous anecdotes of Taiichi Ohno refusing to read more
than the first page of written reports. Instead he'd say "let's go and
see" and make people "get the facts" while he tested their
thinking.
How does A3 relate to other
lean tools and concepts?
It really compliments anything
in TPS (Lean Manufacturing). In fact we sort of cringe at the notion of calling
it a tool. The last thing we want to see is another movement of starting QC
Circles or drawing Value Stream Maps just for the sake of the activity. A3
Thinking is about a logical and critical thinking process that can be applied in
any discipline. Think of it is a thinking pattern to be used in problem
solving, improvement or any activity rather than a tool.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)